<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>polygon annotation - アノサポ｜AIアノテーション・学習データ作成の伴走パートナー</title>
	<atom:link href="https://annotation-support.com/tag/polygon-annotation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>AIアノテーション・学習データ作成の代行ならアノサポ。画像・動画・3D点群・LiDAR・LLM(RLHF)まで対応し、全量検収で品質一貫性99.7%、初期費用0円の完全従量課金。累計1,000件超の実績でAI開発に伴走します。</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 05:46:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>ja</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Semantic Segmentation Annotation: Pixel-Level Data and Outsourcing</title>
		<link>https://annotation-support.com/en/news/semantic-segmentation-annotation-guide/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[masa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 08:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[autonomous driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Annotation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data-centric AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground truth data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical imaging AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PoC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polygon annotation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic segmentation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://annotation-support.com/?post_type=news_en&#038;p=2527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>You got a bounding-box detector running, and the boxes are technically correct — but the edges are too loose f [&#8230;]</p>
<p>投稿 <a href="https://annotation-support.com/en/news/semantic-segmentation-annotation-guide/">Semantic Segmentation Annotation: Pixel-Level Data and Outsourcing</a> は <a href="https://annotation-support.com">アノサポ｜AIアノテーション・学習データ作成の伴走パートナー</a> に最初に表示されました。</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got a bounding-box detector running, and the boxes are technically correct — but the edges are too loose for what you actually need. A tumor&#8217;s boundary in a medical scan. The exact drivable surface in front of a vehicle. A defect&#8217;s precise area on a production line. At that point, boxes stop being enough, and you&#8217;re looking at semantic segmentation: labeling data at the pixel level instead of the object level.</p>
<p>This guide covers when segmentation is actually necessary, a 5-step workflow for building a segmentation dataset, where teams typically get stuck doing it in-house, and how to start small with a PoC instead of committing to a full dataset upfront.</p>
<details class="ano-toc" open>
<summary>Table of contents</summary>
<ul>
<li><a href="#section-1">When You Actually Need Segmentation</a></li>
<li><a href="#section-2">Bounding Boxes vs. Segmentation</a></li>
<li><a href="#section-3">Building a Segmentation Dataset: 5 Steps</a></li>
<li class="ano-toc-sub"><a href="#section-3-1">1. Collect representative data</a></li>
<li class="ano-toc-sub"><a href="#section-3-2">2. Define classes and a labeling spec</a></li>
<li class="ano-toc-sub"><a href="#section-3-3">3. Annotate</a></li>
<li class="ano-toc-sub"><a href="#section-3-4">4. Convert format and split the dataset</a></li>
<li class="ano-toc-sub"><a href="#section-3-5">5. Train, evaluate, and go back to the data</a></li>
<li><a href="#section-4">Where In-House Teams Get Stuck</a></li>
<li><a href="#section-5">Start Small: The Case for a PoC</a></li>
<li><a href="#section-6">In-House vs. Outsourcing</a></li>
<li><a href="#section-7">Working with a Japan-Based Annotation Partner</a></li>
<li><a href="#faq">Frequently asked questions</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<h2 id="section-1">When You Actually Need Segmentation</h2>
<p>Segmentation matters when the <em>shape</em> of an object — not just its location — determines whether your model is useful. Three cases come up repeatedly:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Medical imaging</strong>: precisely delineating a tumor, organ, or lesion boundary</li>
<li><strong>Autonomous driving / ADAS</strong>: pixel-level drivable-area, lane, and pedestrian boundaries</li>
<li><strong>Manufacturing visual inspection</strong>: measuring the exact shape and area of a defect</li>
</ul>
<p>If your use case only needs to know <em>whether</em> and roughly <em>where</em> an object is present — inventory counts, simple detection alerts — bounding boxes are usually sufficient and considerably cheaper to produce. Getting this distinction right up front avoids paying for precision you don&#8217;t need.</p>
<p>For point-level segmentation of LiDAR data rather than images, see <a href="/en/news/3d-point-cloud-annotation-guide/">3D point cloud annotation</a>.</p>
<h2 id="section-2">Bounding Boxes vs. Segmentation</h2>
<div class="ano-tablewrap">
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Aspect</th>
<th>Bounding Box</th>
<th>Segmentation</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Label shape</td>
<td>Rectangle (4 points)</td>
<td>Polygon or pixel-level mask</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Information captured</td>
<td>Approximate location and size</td>
<td>Exact boundary, area, and shape</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Typical labeling time</td>
<td>Fast</td>
<td>Often several times longer per image</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Indicative pricing (our rates)</td>
<td><span class="ano-price">from $0.036</span> / label</td>
<td><span class="ano-price">from $0.152</span> / region</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Best fit</td>
<td>Detection, counting, simple tracking</td>
<td>Medical diagnostics, autonomous driving, defect inspection</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>The higher per-unit cost of segmentation reflects the labor of tracing a precise boundary rather than dropping four points. It&#8217;s easy to over-specify — requesting pixel-perfect masks for a task that only needed coarse localization — so it&#8217;s worth confirming the precision requirement before committing to a labeling spec.</p>
<h2 id="section-3">Building a Segmentation Dataset: 5 Steps</h2>
<h3 id="section-3-1">1. Collect representative data</h3>
<p>Start by gathering images or video that reflect the conditions your model will actually see in production. Medical images vary by device and facility; driving scenes vary by weather, time of day, and region. Most downstream accuracy problems trace back to insufficient diversity at this stage, not to the model architecture.</p>
<h3 id="section-3-2">2. Define classes and a labeling spec</h3>
<p>Next, define exactly what gets labeled and how. This is where class-boundary ambiguity causes the most trouble: should &#8220;pedestrian&#8221; and &#8220;cyclist&#8221; be separate classes? How should overlapping or adjacent objects be handled — allowed to overlap slightly, or forced to have a gap? Writing these rules down before annotation begins prevents a costly full re-label later. Annotation guidelines here function the same way a style guide functions for text — without one, inter-annotator agreement drops fast.</p>
<h3 id="section-3-3">3. Annotate</h3>
<p>With the spec in place, annotators trace boundaries using polygon or brush tools. Many teams now use semi-automatic tools like Segment Anything (SAM) to generate a rough mask that a human then corrects — this speeds up throughput, but raw model output shouldn&#8217;t be accepted as-is. Boundary precision from automated pre-labeling varies enough that a review step is non-negotiable if consistency matters.</p>
<h3 id="section-3-4">4. Convert format and split the dataset</h3>
<p>Once labeling is done, convert annotations into the format your training pipeline expects — commonly COCO-style polygon coordinates or PNG mask files — and split the data into train, validation, and test sets.</p>
<h3 id="section-3-5">5. Train, evaluate, and go back to the data</h3>
<p>Train the model and evaluate using metrics like IoU (Intersection over Union). When accuracy falls short, the fix isn&#8217;t always architectural — check which classes had the most boundary ambiguity or which scenarios were underrepresented in the training set. In a data-centric AI workflow, the dataset is usually where the fastest gains are found.</p>
<h2 id="section-4">Where In-House Teams Get Stuck</h2>
<p>Three problems show up consistently in teams building segmentation datasets internally:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Boundary drift</strong>: different annotators trace edges differently, and consistency degrades as more people are involved — a direct inter-annotator agreement problem</li>
<li><strong>Underestimated QA time</strong>: review and correction usually take longer than the initial labeling pass, and teams rarely budget for it upfront</li>
<li><strong>Engineering time diverted</strong>: hours meant for model development get absorbed by labeling logistics and spec revisions instead</li>
</ul>
<p>None of this means segmentation should always be outsourced — but any in-house plan should account for these costs explicitly rather than discovering them mid-project.</p>
<p>Pixie Dust Technologies ran into exactly this. Color-coding rebar by type for their construction-site inspection AI is segmentation work, and doing it in-house alongside algorithm development was estimated at four months. A six-person annotation team completed it in two, returning roughly two months of engineer time to the development work.</p>
<a class="ano-linkcard" href="/en/case/pixiedusttech/"><span class="ano-linkcard-body"><span class="ano-linkcard-title">Data for construction-site AI delivered at scale, fast</span><span class="ano-linkcard-desc">Case study: Pixie Dust Technologies&#039; rebar-inspection DX &quot;TOTTARROW&quot; recognition AI. A dedicated 6-person ANOSUPO team delivered high-quality, color-coded rebar annotation in two months — saving about two months of in-house engineer time and freeing the team for core algorithm work.</span><span class="ano-linkcard-domain">annotation-support.com</span></span><span class="ano-linkcard-ph"><img src="https://annotation-support.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/ogp2-768x403.png" alt="" width="480" height="270" loading="lazy" decoding="async"></span></a>
<h2 id="section-5">Start Small: The Case for a PoC</h2>
<p>Estimating &#8220;how many regions we&#8217;ll need&#8221; precisely, before you&#8217;ve labeled anything, is close to guesswork. A more practical approach: run a PoC on 50–100 images first, confirm both model behavior and the soundness of your labeling spec, and only then scale to a full dataset. If your raw data also needs cleanup or preprocessing before labeling can start, it&#8217;s worth scoping that alongside the PoC — see <a href="/en/service/data-collection/">data collection and preprocessing</a> for what that typically involves.</p>
<a class="ano-linkcard" href="/en/service/data-collection/"><span class="ano-linkcard-body"><span class="ano-linkcard-title">Data Collection &#038; Preprocessing</span><span class="ano-linkcard-desc">Data collection &amp; preprocessing outsourcing — collection/capture, cleansing, anonymization &amp; annotation preprocessing. We collect hard-to-source data from scratch. 99.7% quality, $0 setup, fully usage-based.</span><span class="ano-linkcard-domain">annotation-support.com</span></span><span class="ano-linkcard-ph"><img src="https://annotation-support.com/wp-content/themes/annotation-support-v2/assets/img/front-v3/card/data-collection.webp" alt="" width="480" height="270" loading="lazy" decoding="async"></span></a>
<h2 id="section-6">In-House vs. Outsourcing</h2>
<div class="ano-tablewrap">
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Factor</th>
<th>In-house tends to fit</th>
<th>Outsourcing tends to fit</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Data volume</td>
<td>Small, one-off</td>
<td>Ongoing, large-scale</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Spec sensitivity</td>
<td>Extremely confidential</td>
<td>Manageable with NDAs and per-project team isolation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Engineering bandwidth</td>
<td>Available</td>
<td>Needed for model development instead</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Label consistency</td>
<td>Requires its own QA process</td>
<td>Built on full-volume inspection by default</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Segmentation is one of the more expensive annotation types, so it&#8217;s often the first task teams outsource. See our <a href="/en/news/data-annotation-outsourcing-guide/">data annotation outsourcing guide</a> for what drives unit price and how to compare vendors.</p>
<h2 id="section-7">Working with a Japan-Based Annotation Partner</h2>
<p>ANOSUPO, operated by Borderless Japan, provides segmentation annotation as part of its <a href="/en/service/image/">image and video annotation</a> service. Instead of sampling-based spot checks, every deliverable goes through full-volume inspection, with a measured label consistency of 99.7%. Pricing is fully usage-based — no setup fee, no account management fee, and no minimum order — with segmentation PoCs typically starting around 50–100 images. Any defects traced to our process are corrected free of charge for one year after delivery. Rate details are on the <a href="/en/price/">pricing page</a>.</p>
<a class="ano-linkcard" href="/en/price/"><span class="ano-linkcard-body"><span class="ano-linkcard-title">Pricing</span><span class="ano-linkcard-desc">Transparent annotation pricing — Bbox from $0.036/label, keypoints from $0.021/point, segmentation from $0.152/region, 3D cuboids from $0.121, LLM evaluation from $0.121. $0 setup, fully usage-based, no minimum order.</span><span class="ano-linkcard-domain">annotation-support.com</span></span><span class="ano-linkcard-ph"><img src="https://annotation-support.com/wp-content/themes/annotation-support-v2/assets/img/front-v3/card/price.webp" alt="" width="480" height="270" loading="lazy" decoding="async"></span></a>
<p>On the security side, the company holds ISO/IEC 27001 (ISMS) certification, doesn&#8217;t retain or process data locally (cloud-only), has NDAs with all staff, isolates teams per project, and physically deletes data once a project is complete — none of it is used to train the company&#8217;s own models.</p>
<p>For teams working primarily with bounding boxes rather than segmentation, our companion guide on <a href="/en/news/how-to-create-yolo-training-data/">building YOLO training data</a> covers the box-annotation workflow in the same level of detail.</p>
<a class="ano-linkcard" href="/en/news/how-to-create-yolo-training-data/"><span class="ano-linkcard-body"><span class="ano-linkcard-title">How to Create Training Data for YOLO: Annotation Workflow and Starting Small with a PoC</span><span class="ano-linkcard-desc">A five-step workflow for YOLO training data: class design, annotation, label format, and sizing your first PoC.</span><span class="ano-linkcard-domain">annotation-support.com</span></span><span class="ano-linkcard-ph"><img src="https://annotation-support.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/img-3-768x512.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="270" loading="lazy" decoding="async"></span></a>
<h2 id="faq">Frequently asked questions</h2>
<div class="ano-faq">
<h3>Should I use segmentation or bounding boxes?</h3>
<p>If knowing an object&#8217;s approximate location is enough — detection, counting, simple alerts — bounding boxes are usually sufficient and cheaper. If the shape or area of the object itself matters — medical diagnostics, drivable-area detection — segmentation is necessary.</p>
<h3>Is there a minimum order for segmentation annotation?</h3>
<p>No. PoCs typically start at around 50–100 images.</p>
<h3>Can I test the service before committing?</h3>
<p>Yes. A small sample of your own data (roughly 10–50 items) is annotated under the actual production workflow so you can evaluate quality before placing a full order.</p>
<h3>If I use SAM or another auto-labeling tool, do I still need review?</h3>
<p>Auto-labeling tools speed up the rough draft, but boundary precision from automated output varies enough that a review step matters for consistency. Without full-volume inspection, quality drift can go unnoticed until it shows up in model performance.</p>
<h3>How is our data handled?</h3>
<p>Under ISO/IEC 27001 (ISMS) certification, with cloud-only processing (no local storage), NDAs across all staff, per-project team isolation, and physical deletion of data after project completion. Data is never used to train our own models.</p>
</div>
<a class="ano-linkcard" href="/en/security/"><span class="ano-linkcard-body"><span class="ano-linkcard-title">Security</span><span class="ano-linkcard-desc">ANOSUPO security. ISO/IEC 27001 (ISMS) certified, with a strict no-retention/no-local-storage policy, NDAs with all staff and per-project team isolation to keep your training data safe.</span><span class="ano-linkcard-domain">annotation-support.com</span></span><span class="ano-linkcard-ph"><img src="https://annotation-support.com/wp-content/themes/annotation-support-v2/assets/img/front-v3/card/security.webp" alt="" width="480" height="270" loading="lazy" decoding="async"></span></a>
<h2 id="summary">Summary</h2>
<p>Segmentation earns its cost when shape — not just location — determines whether a model is useful. The workflow itself isn&#8217;t exotic: representative data, a clear labeling spec, careful annotation, format conversion, and a feedback loop back from evaluation to the dataset. Where teams typically lose time is boundary consistency and QA, in-house or out. Starting with a small PoC, rather than committing to a full dataset upfront, is usually the fastest way to find out which approach fits.</p>
<div class="ano-cta">
<p class="ano-cta-head">Try our quality on your own data — for free.</p>
</div>
<a class="ano-linkcard" href="/en/free-trial/"><span class="ano-linkcard-body"><span class="ano-linkcard-title">Free Trial</span><span class="ano-linkcard-desc">Annotate a sample of your own data under our production workflow before committing to a full order.</span><span class="ano-linkcard-domain">annotation-support.com</span></span><span class="ano-linkcard-ph"><img src="https://annotation-support.com/wp-content/themes/annotation-support-v2/assets/img/front-v3/card/free-trial.webp" alt="" width="480" height="270" loading="lazy" decoding="async"></span></a>
<p>投稿 <a href="https://annotation-support.com/en/news/semantic-segmentation-annotation-guide/">Semantic Segmentation Annotation: Pixel-Level Data and Outsourcing</a> は <a href="https://annotation-support.com">アノサポ｜AIアノテーション・学習データ作成の伴走パートナー</a> に最初に表示されました。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
